434 karma · joined July 26, 2014
This is a real problem, but I suspect the reason is more laziness than increasing power. That's no score card on number of classified documents one has access to.
Rather, it is time consuming and risky to determine classification level. No one is going to get in trouble for mistakenly over classifying something, but theoretically risks jail and fines for under classifying a document, not to mention the real harm that could arise from such an error.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html%3FnodeI...
If you want to get into foraging, there are some really easy to identify safe ones without dangerous lookalikes. Get a good identification book on the topic. Don't listen to random strangers on the Internet, and don't trust apps.
My optimistic belief is the high judgement was due to those extra factors, but maybe a lawyer can correct me.
However, I will say that combined with the freemium model it does give me pause. The reason is I will likely want to add some features that will conflict with the premium version. That means that my changes have near zero chance of getting incorporated into the community version and I'll have to maintain a public fork.
It's AGPL
They have the community version/premium model. Differentiators of premium (from https://photoprism.app/features):
* support
* higher max res (900MP vs. 150MP)
* non-rate limited reverse geocoding
* higher quality maps
* premium themes
* visual configuration options
* hardware video transcoding
1: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/05/askers-...
Even in the '90s developers embedded assembly in the performance critical areas of C code.
Flipping it around, if we were going to do send a message to the universe would we send an h.265 bgr video with aac audio in streaming mp4 format?
The only thing you can know for sure you have in common with someone receiving your radio signal is that they can receive radio signals, so using something about radio transmission would be a good bet for building a lexicon. Then there's the universal constants and mathematics which we could assume are known in common.
The two big ifs are: would UBI be the same cost as current welfare programs, and can we actually get rid of current welfare if we roll out UBI? There is a tremendous amount of overhead involved in current welfare programs, so it's not unreasonable that the first question is could be resolved. Politically, the second issue seems unlikely to be implemented.