jimbobimbo

Still no diaper emoji. :(

"Why is this function here? *Discuss.*"

I have similar issue with dark mode applied to content - hurts my eyes. I prefer to have window chrome in dark, to make "fade away". The only application which allows me to have my cake and eat it is Firefox: I can run Windows in dark yet read web in light mode.

I wish Windows would steal this feature for the whole OS: I don't want Notepad to use dark for text, but per-app setting usually turns the whole app light.

I think of my AI use as me contracting an offshore team (no skin in the game) but I can be as micromanaging as I want to.

Thank you! Looking into this now.

Thanks, yes, I own the domain for 20+ years, but pay yearly renewals.

I never really had any issues w/ GoDaddy, but am looking to change to Cloudflare now. I don't understand what am I paying $20+ for.

GoDaddy.

I just renewed domain name I own for maybe 20+ years, for $23/yr. This is nuts.

"To drive the point home she [Pelosi] picked up a water glass next to her and said: “This glass of water would win with a ‘D’ next to its name in those districts.”"

Let's not pretend that only one 40-45% part of the population votes on a party line.

Unfortunately, it depends on the disc. Some discs always start from barely skippable junk.

Thank you, well put! Bots reviewing code written by bots is a self licking ice cream cone.

I use similar approach, but use gpt to review plan written by opus.

I have a picture of my car in street view photo made by Bing. Sold the car long ago, nice keepsake.

Behind the scenes is unbearable.

Alternative headline: my university had bought a (cheaper?) plan which doesn't tick all necessary boxes.

My problem recently is to have people read design docs I'm writing.

The most surprising part, however, is that when one model slops this into a plan, another model somehow is able to interpret it correctly enough to produce code to spec.

I see this at work. People are "writing" specs and design proposals with bots. This is noticeable and is a huge turn off. I don't have issues with using bots to aid research, but I'm not reading the doc you slopped together.

"Хотели как лучше, а получилось как всегда."

My instructions for agents have "find a synonym to 'resolve'". Otherwise I havea bunch of Resolver classes with every other method called ResolveThis or ResolveThat.

It is very efficient until it's not. When it's not, it sucks. You don't have to have full on diabetes to experience the suck.

My story is: I had a really bad crash after eating a chocolate, which never happened before. That prompted the bloodwork, which shown that A1c was not where it's supposed to be.

I bought CGM myself, without any doctor's input. Didn't know they exist before reading some selfhelp book which my wife found.

Echoing another poster, it's eye opening how some of the foods you'd never think of, are spiking glucose levels.

Overall, after both me and my wife adjusted diet, much better energy through the day, no crashes.

That's what I thought too, until I got my last bloodwork results and started wearing one of the OTC continuous glucose monitors.

That device helped a lot to switch diet habits.

To be fair, the guy on the picture doesn't even look like Jim Carrey, so...

This is the way. I use gh copilot and have opus interrogate me and write the plan, then gpt review the plan and provide feedback; repeat this multiple times until gpt is either satisfied or starts to nitpick on unimportant stuff. Then sanity check the plan myself and have gpt implement it.

Each implementation is also reviewed by me before merging to master. I complete PRs only when I'm satisfied with the implementation, my feedback is addressed, and I fully understand what is going on. Agents are the replacement for typing and productivity multipliers.

I have big picture view of the product, each plan implements only a part of it, scoped to avoid merging unreviwed slop. Probably slower, but result is much better.

The new 85th St & I-405 interchange is horrible. I took it twice and both times it's too stressful and takes much longer to get off 405.

As a fastmail user I'm glad there was no announcement. Every time a company starts telling me about some bright future, this usually means my user experience is about to sink.

Why would this even be in the chat? Showing recent transactions is a basic functionality of a bank.

I asked Claude to describe an app I was working on and it managed to describe the purpose of the app by looking only at implementation, no relevant docs in the repo. This was truly oh shit moment and I'm using AI assistance on that app since then.

>I kinda just expect it to be all “AWS” trust.

This would be very unwise from security standpoint. Internal access to customer stuff is granular and made hard for internal staff to gain, to minimize chances of screw up intentional or not.