14 karma · joined February 24, 2013
Before switching, I wondered how it would affect my ability to use qwerty. Happily, I never lost my ability to be proficient on small keyboards (phone, labelmazer, etc.) that are too small for ten-fingered touch typing. If you switch, you will be able to text away using qwerty without any trouble.
But when it comes to touch typing, can you full-on switch back and forth between qwerty and Dvorak without difficulty? I can't really give you a field-tested answer to this question. I make it a point not to touch-type on full-sized qwerty keyboards--I don't want to risk slowing down on Dvorak. However, on the rare occasions when I need to go qwerty on a full-sized keyboard, I get the sense that switching back to qwerty would be fairly easy. When I use a qwerty keyboard I'm a little awkward--I have to think about where the letters are, but I've "still got it". I get the sense that I'd be back in fine qwerty form if I continued on for a few minutes. But . . . why would I want to go back? Dvorak just flows out of your fingers, and now qwerty just seems like something from the Ministry of Silly Typing. Unless you are typing the word "qwerty" over and over again, Dvorak is the way to go.
Also, a word on control-key combinations aren't really that big of a deal. But . . . OS X gives you the option of retaining the qwerty layout for control-key combinations if you don't want to go whole-hog.
And vim? Well, h/j/k/l still move the cursor the same way, but obviously the actual keys for h/j/k/l will no longer be adjacent to each other. Using these keys to move the cursor won't be as intuitive, but can it be said that vim users are prone to whimpering about things not being idiot-proof?
Along the same vein, video/audio editing programs tend to assume a qwerty layout is being used; if the editing app you use allows you to control the playhead with "letters", expect their position to change and be non-adjacent.
You won't be using Dvorak on mobile devices, but this is no big deal. If you're proficient with qwerty, you'll always retain the ability to use the qwerty layouts in a non-touch-typing manner just as well as before.
Since switching, I've avoided doing touch-typing on a full qwerty keyboard because I'm worried that going both ways could dull my Dvorak edge. I can tell I'm even faster than before, and it does feel more natural.
On the rare times I need to use someone else's keyboard, I can do it--but I'm clumsy and observers will be entertained by the spectacle of a tech wiz who "can't type on a normal keyboard". However, If I use a full qwerty keyboard for more than about thirty seconds the old qwerty-fu starts returning. I have never used a qwerty keyboard much longer than that because I just don't want to go back. I don't know, but I'd bet you if I wanted to go back to qwerty I'd be programmer-level proficient again in a week or two. Maybe even less.
It would be interesting to see if I could get proficient on both keyboards like bilingual people can switch between languages. I'm not curious enough about it to risk slowing down my cruising speed, though.
One more thought: I learned Dvorak without the benefit of a keyboard overlay. The first few days would probably be much easier if you use one.
Oh, and one more one more thought: I switched while self-employed. There were no jeering coworkers or impatient bosses to contend with.
And a final one more thought: be prepared to be asked about it. Most muggles have never heard of Dvorak.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0L6t0xh-Dc
(Warning: video may not be suitable for all audiences.)The Power of TED (The Empowerment Dynamic) by David Emerald
Loving What Is: Four Questions That Can Change Your Life by Byron Katie
Get Out of Your Own Way: Overcoming Self-Defeating Behavior by Mark Goulston and Philip Goldberg
Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy by David Burns
Mojo: How to Get It, How to Keep It, How to Get It Back if you Lose It by Marshall Goldsmith
The New Manual 2.0 by Tripp Lanier thenewmanual.com