MIT admits 1275 students. So, 9% difference is about 115.
3,541 karma · joined September 16, 2014
MIT admits 1275 students. So, 9% difference is about 115.
Even many Indians are trafficked to SE Asia in the name of employment, only to scam Indians. And these scam centers are run by Chinese.
[1] Cambodia: Hundreds of Indians rescued from cyber-scam factories: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68705913
[2] Cambodia Job Scam Victims Beaten & Deprived Of Meals. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5X5xVSiFHQ
[3] In Cambodia, reporting on illegal scam centers brings threats https://www.voanews.com/a/in-cambodia-reporting-on-illegal-s...
[4] They’re Forced to Run Online Scams. Their Captors Are Untouchable. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/28/world/asia/cambodia-cyber... https://archive.is/H7Vex
[5] Inside the 'living hell' of Cambodia's scam operations https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20221109-inside-the-li...
[6] Chinese Mob Has 100K Slaves Working in Cambodian Cybercrime Mills https://www.darkreading.com/cyberattacks-data-breaches/chine...
This tells us why many species have found herbal stuff to alleviate pain, cure ailments, etc.
There is a way to get around this problem of proving culpability of individuals in large organizations. RICO was a way to go after mafia bosses. Thanks to the revolving door (of politicians, staffers of various committees, DOJ employees, prosecutors), it is impossible for the latter class to use RICO to go after any executive of any large company. Of course, one can say SBF was convicted; here, it was easy to find evidence to prosecute and convict SBF.
Can you help find the page number where Kuhn talks about jargon?
Two cases from this piece:
(1) 'The recipient shared: “I decided to name the boy. He is younger than me, so I call him Timmy. He had an accident when he fell down. It seems he really enjoys Power Rangers, just like I did in the past. However, I have lost interest in them now.” The recipient’s father clarified that neither his son nor the family were initially aware of the donor’s name or age. Eventually, they discovered that the donor was named Thomas, but his close family referred to him as Tim. The recipient’s mother mentioned that they later found out Tim died after falling from a window ledge while trying to reach for a Power Ranger toy.'
(2) 'The paper highlights this example: “A 56-year-old college professor received the heart of a 34-year-old police officer who tragically lost his life after he was fatally shot in the face. “Following the transplant, the recipient reported a peculiar experience, stating, ‘A few weeks after I got my heart, I began to have dreams. I would see a flash of light right in my face, and my face gets real, real hot. It actually burns.’”'
Those who quibble about definitions should develop theories and test them, amend them, replace them. All these activities help understand the phenomenon in the question. When people engage in definitional disputes, it shows that intuitions about the phenomenon conflict. That’s all. To settle these issues, one should do science: that is, develop theories, derive consequences, add back ground theories to test these consequences.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structuralism_(philosophy_of_s...