The level of carelessness was astonishing to me.
22,165 karma · joined September 28, 2007
On most of the internet and elsewhere as riffraff
https://mastodon.social/@riffraff
https://bsky.app/profile/riffraff.info
Blog mostly in english at http://www.riffraff.info
Emailable as rff.rff at gmail dot com
I'm pleased to meet you :)
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/riffraff; my proof: https://keybase.io/riffraff/sigs/Sk28WtmTwza0fWgh8lM2Zh5_WhIol453WmJrHUSOl6E ]
The level of carelessness was astonishing to me.
It's not like the previous tree based bots were good but at least they had a path to speaking with a person.
I suspect nobody ever tried to use the bot.
Like calibre, I guess :)
Gambling has to do with putting money in a proposition, not with sports. "I bet you I can drink two points before you" is not a financial statement.
Facebook scandals had exploded already, Google had already long abandoned "don't be evil", nobody ever liked Microsoft, and I think sentiment towards Apple is somewhat unchanged.
I enjoyed Strange New Worlds, but it has too many "weird" episodes.
As an aside, I got sniped into finding out why this insula is called "insula of the chaste lovers", given Pompei is quite known for sexual imagery. It's apparently because there's a house called ".. of the chaste lovers" because of a fresco where two lovers share an apparently chaste kiss
https://mediterraneoantico.it/articoli/archeologia-classica/...
I'm a GPL person but that's not why Linux won over the BSDs.
Consider commuting with a friend in the morning: if you get dressed and get out of the door in 5m instead of 10m, but then have to wait for me to come pick you up, and then we both sit in a car for 5m to get to the train, and then we sit on that for 50.. then your speed up doesn't really matter.
I don't know if this is the case for drug development but as GP said, we already have more designs than we can test.
Any other exchange becomes pointless as you won't be completing a color anyways.
I have no idea how that's supposed to work.
Big malicious entities always had more investments in this than random open source projects.
you don't even have to get rid of it, even consuming less beef has significant impacts.
ozone, marine fish capture, tropical forest loss, and domesticated land are shown as below peak, aren't they?
I am with you with wanting carbon taxes, but it's not like there's a single issue that can ever be tackled at a time.
> Blind guessing would average about 3.0 of them (11%).
Admittedly I gave up before the 30 threshold but I think I did well enough at "beating the house"
Edit: tried again, 14/118, which is 12%. Maybe it's because I'm typing, and that's easier to do that speaking up.