“Google replied to the tweet directly, saying, “Bard is an early experiment based on Large Language Models and will make mistakes. It is not trained on Gmail data. -JQ”.
20 karma · joined November 19, 2022
“Google replied to the tweet directly, saying, “Bard is an early experiment based on Large Language Models and will make mistakes. It is not trained on Gmail data. -JQ”.
To the author’s credit, I loved that he is thinking analytically and he did take the feedback positively - there are some good ideas in the post.
However I assume here we are talking about dotted lists and not ‘proper’ ones?
> Yes, very nice. But it needs an update on structured documents (tree-like, as in HTML). And, ideally, it should be accompanied by work that addresses collaborative editing in such structured documents.
CLOS itself is great, however the decoupling of data and methods is something at times I find leads to harder to understand code.
Perhaps saying they are light weight objects (where objects has its meaning as instances of classes) is a good way of saying it.
The realisation that closures and objects are very similar is one of the main turning points in becoming proficient in both OOP and Functional Programming, it was for me at least.