What do you all use for your pg backups? Is Barman ( https://pgbarman.org/) still the way many do it? (I haven't deployed a new pg instance for a while, but thinking about it for a new project).
367 karma · joined March 30, 2011
What do you all use for your pg backups? Is Barman ( https://pgbarman.org/) still the way many do it? (I haven't deployed a new pg instance for a while, but thinking about it for a new project).
I would absolutely love to know more about this if you are willing to share the story?
If you were using the CDN without SRIs, then yes, that would have been the most obvious channel. However, I don't believe the attacker ever set up for that and the URLs never resolved due to CloudFlare blocking it.
> there's been some pretty huge breaking changes
Unless you were using the legacy API, there shouldn't be any major impediment [1]. I intentionally tried to keep backwards compatibility as I hate doing library upgrades myself! Drop me an email - allan at the domain in question if you have any questions about doing an upgrade.
> It looks like newer versions of datatables don't import static files from the datatables CDN like this.
I rewrote aspects to use CSS styled elements in place of images, so there were less resources to load.
> Would it make sense to issue a CVE for older datatables library versions that could be susceptible to this attack?
Per the above, if you were using the CDN without SRI for the resources, then any version could have been susceptible. However, I've seen no evidence that the attack took that vector.
Regarding the 1000 error - I didn't have any 1:1 support contact with CloudFlare - the first I knew was they were returning 1000 errors, which I presume they were doing due to a blacklisted IP being used for the DNS resolving. I'm really not sure though.
To some degree you have to trust the software you are using not to mess things up.
> Our engineering team has looked into this and you'll need to have your users mark the mail and not spam. We don't have anything else to suggest.
It is unbelievably frustrating. I'm giving up on using Google Groups (which is perhaps what Yahoo and Microsoft want).
Open source needs to find a way to make money and backlinks is a reasonable way of doing it. I should say for my own open source project I refuse backlinks to gambling sites on morality grounds though - although looking at how much revenue it might bring in on a monthly basis, there is a lot of temptation there.
67 logos on the home page at the time of writing this, that's $6'700/m. While obviously not FAANG salary scale, it isn't to be sneezed at either.
As someone who fondly remembers the early Firebug days, it is great to see this. It is very frustrating to me that tablets and phones are so powerful, but we can't do even basic dev stuff on them.
Your web-site is more clear in that it shows a Node.js snippet (and other environments, although funnily not just in the browser?). Then the site goes on to talk about the React components.
Perhaps "Email API for Developers, with React components" would resolve the issue. The title as it stands suggests I wouldn't be interested in this at all since I'm not using React. But actually, as an e-mail API, I would be (e.g. with a Hugo site).
More generally, I think it is great to see development in this area from Algolia and Search.io to Typesense and others. Being able to have a customisable search which is really fast, can make a bit difference on a web-site.
Taking this approach would punish us for trying to move away from direct fossil fuel consumption (I'm aware that much electricity still comes form fossil fuels).
So there is a lot of nuance in the proposal - allowances for electric cars, heat pumps (which the government is actively encouraging), mains gas, etc. Do each of these affect the basic needs?
An alternative that crossed my mind was to change the unit price based on house hold income. Higher income households would pay a higher rate per kWh, which I think would be considered progressive. Can't see the Tories ever going for that though.