1,958 karma · joined December 9, 2014
Feels like we have enough motivated and skill people to do and maintain that.
No doubt it's a way WAY better device, really, but I don't see where I would actually need that. I happily toss the one I have around and don't even care if it gets stolen or lost one day, different preference.
Everybody wants a $1 Website, avoid security updates, pay nothing for maintenance, and done yesterday.
It has nothing to do with AI or a specific language or stack. As long as cost cutting will be the culture, driven by the economical model of competition, then we will accumulate technical debt BECAUSE it is the strategy.
Total or Shell use a lot of state of the art technology to mine, they are still oil companies.
I'm making a provocative shortcut.
The glossy magazines read by C-suite is the slick marketing part, not the actual product.
Suggestions and ideas welcomed.
FWIW on pairing keyboard I also tinkered with https://mastodon.pirateparty.be/@utopiah/117178674206706009 specifically for this setup.
- cheap Android that can potentially be rooted : Quest 3
- deep into the Apple ecosystem and not a hardcore gamer : Vision Pro
- gamer and Linux tinkerer or just want an open device : Steam Frame
The upcoming Meta headset is also quite nice possibly for remote work but again it's Android and from Meta.
The economy of anonymity by Amaya
Artificial Intimacy by Sherry Turkle, just out
At the risk of being presumptuous I believe that's the wrong way of looking at it. The point isn't to show the entire World that everything you did is perfect (because it's not, for anyone) but rather to grow from potential collaborations, even if only just discussions in issues. It is a humbling process to show how something was built but with a positive crowd it is definitely leading to growth!
- AR where the machine can be put on your desk, next to documents
- VR where the machine is in context, e.g. a 3D model of German Naval Signals HQ in Guernsey, eventually stepping back to a broader context.
Putin or Trump are totally isolated from economical and political consequences so they have no problem severing ties. If there are genuine co-dependencies, including for the leaders, they it's much harder to break peace.
I imagine the ideological aspect is the deeper motivation but it only matters with the right circumstances.
Adding a warning about it could help.