32,304 karma · joined May 6, 2022
remember that you could be wrong
Absolute claim. I like to interact with intelligence in various ways. Sometimes voice, sometimes thinking, sometimes writing, sometimes playing a sport, sometimes playing music, etc.
Why not news sources that eschew emotional manipulation, like Associated Press or Reuters. They aim for information rather than propaganda.
what and when is the the "next" economic cycle?
I think this assumes that if something is trained on "everything" now it also knows "everything", including relationships, feedback loops, etc. between all the things. I find that unlikely.
What experience does the person have in that field? For instance, have they worked at an audit practice (doesn't have to be one of the Big Four)?
(116 comments)
They’re trained by humans and human behavior fits a pattern. Models don’t have a mind of their own.
You didn’t collaborate with other engineers? Or what if the spec you were given was unclear in places? Forgive me, but the style you describe sounds incredibly collaborative, super transactional.
Here's an analysis from the Associated Press, which suggests you're information is not quite right: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-mark-zuckerberg-ele...
a) centralization (“the network is the computer” is sleight of hand),
b) authoritarianism (“I have the answer”, “my way is the right way”),
c) homogenization (“scale”, “leverage”, “reuse”).
Plant provide, but less efficiently: iron, zinc, choline, calcium (some tofu provides, but depends on coagulant used), iodine.
On the flip side, plants provide fiber and numerous phytochemicals that meat, fish, and eggs lack.
Saying the global economy will be completely destroyed within 100 years does indeed sound hyperbolic, uninformed, alarmist, FWIW.
This sounds interesting. Tell us more?