870 karma · joined November 17, 2022
> Physical manufacturing is hard, but it at least brings in dollars
You say this as if it's some indelible fact that if you make a physical product, it WILL be bought and you WILL make a profit no matter what, but I think it's safe to say this is objectively false, as many failed physical business would attest to.
> OSS, privacy and wankers reverse engineering your software shrinks your market substantially.
As opposed to in the physical world, where nobody ever cribs your ideas and sells them at a discount compared to you... AKA "Amazon's business model"? (not to mention overseas knockoffs of products
Given all these things being equal then, software has all the same benefits that your parent comment mentioned, while staying at best EQUAL with physical manufacturing, save for maybe higher salaries to the people making your product (arguable in some cases, but on average probably true) but this difference pales in comparison to not having to own a warehouse and manage last-mile shipping costs etc.
I wonder how much it has changed since then. My former boss is still working on that project AFAIK, I should reach out to him…
https://github.com/3digitdev/Haiku-TTP-Codes
Doesn’t have any for 418 yet though… a PR may be in order!
Have you MET programmers? The idea that we/they would do this is not anywhere close to surprising.
Her solution to burnout was to _start her own business_?? I'm glad this worked out for her in the end, but holy shit this would be the literal last possible thing I (or I hope many others) would consider as a solution to burnout. That's a _fast track_ to burnout.
*EDIT:*. They also have a python library that’s pretty easy to use. It finally has an ARM build too finally…
*EDIT 2:* Just started tinkering with Azure again, and yep they support SSML for live modification, and it works with their best neural voice. Diving back in again, here we go...
I mean, not in this case -- in this case they got 3 features implemented for them for free. That's why they did it.
Um....disagree. That's literally THE question being discussed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ra34dUWcmw
More glibly:
"'Money doesn't buy happiness!' Do you live in America...? Because it buys a waverunner. You ever seen a sad person on a waverunner?"
- Daniel Tosh
- Click the Link
- Click the "Start the meeting button", nothing happens
- Click "join meeting from browser" after waitint for it to eventually show me that option
- I'm in the meeting! 3 clicks
Number of clicks from a Google Meets email to a Zoom call:
- Click the Link
- I'm in the meeting! 1 click.
He also had a (now deleted) comment where he called the guy "just the worst":
https://twitter.com/JamesClayton5/status/1633155915892527104
As a hobbyist in a small shop, I bought it as my "best saw i'll need for a very long time".
The $200 saws are pieces of garbage that anyone who pursues the hobby for more than like a few months will rapidly discover the flaws of. Best bet is middle-road to get like a dewalt for $400 or so but even that has flaws compared to the sawstop.
Based on how fervently she's defending herself, that seems likely to me.
But yes you're absolutely right that there was no chance she was going to actually admit it was a bad idea for her to commit like this. People don't like admitting that stuff and will do whatever they can to avoid it.
- She VERY obviously didn't learn her lesson. See her tweets after the layoff.
- The insane number of people responding with positive encouragement for "how hard [she] worked" and how it sets a good example. What a fucking travesty of a work culture some people have.
VALUE YOUR OWN TIME PEOPLE. All she did was help Elon attempt to recover a stupid business decision, and her reward was being sent back into the job market to do the same thing for some other billionaire in the future. This is the TEXTBOOK definition of being taken advantage of, combined with some astonishing stockholm syndrome.