They're all in regards to design choices or why something is needed when it's not obvious. And such a level of polish in the interface isn't something you attain through prompting. Not AI.
2,357 karma · joined January 31, 2014
They're all in regards to design choices or why something is needed when it's not obvious. And such a level of polish in the interface isn't something you attain through prompting. Not AI.
Release notes: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v25.7.0
CLI:
dig aaaa saile.it
curl -v --resolve "saile.it:443:[2a04:4e42:2::775]" "https://saile.it/1145-pull-requests-per-day/"
curl -v --resolve "saile.it:443:[::ffff:157.245.83.16]" "https://saile.it/1145-pull-requests-per-day/"
GUI:This article delves into just that: https://csswizardry.com/2023/10/the-three-c-concatenate-comp... The first pair of waterfall graphics illustrates the problem clearly.
(What you vaguely remember as not working as intended is probably Server Push).
What year was that?
Latency being much more constraining than bandwidth, embedding a stylesheet that’s small is nearly always the correct tradeoff.
(As demonstrated in the first example of https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/sections.html#the-nav...)
What are those? (Besides Japan’s which you’ve answered here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40143090)
The median JS bundle is 600kB on desktop. p90 (“high 10%”) is 1830kB.
On Windows/Linux closing an app requires doing the obvious thing. Press the big X, you’re done. You’re back to the previous app instantly.
On Mac after closing a window what you see on the screen is a lie (besides the ever subtle menu bar and shades of gray); you’re still in the visually-hidden app.